VCF 9 Automation vs Aria Automation 8.x (Part 2)
6. CI/CD and Automation Pipelines
Aria Automation 8.x
-
Relied heavily on Code Stream
-
Pipelines required more manual configuration
-
Less visibility into infra lifecycle state
VCF 9 Automation
-
CI/CD aligns with VCF lifecycle events
-
Pipelines are more context-aware
-
Better integration with platform operations
Outcome:
Automation pipelines become smarter, not just faster.
7. Operational Visibility & Troubleshooting
Aria Automation 8.x
-
Logs and troubleshooting often siloed
-
Required jumping across products
-
Root cause analysis was time-consuming
VCF 9 Automation
-
Better correlation with VCF components
-
Improved visibility across automation actions
-
Faster troubleshooting due to platform context
Ops Benefit:
Reduced MTTR for automation-related issues.
8. Customization vs Standardization
Aria Automation 8.x
-
Highly customizable
-
Flexibility often led to automation sprawl
-
Difficult to standardize across teams
VCF 9 Automation
-
Encourages standardized automation patterns
-
Customization still possible, but controlled
-
Easier to scale automation across the organization
Trade-off:
Slightly less freedom → significantly more stability.
9. Target Audience Shift
|
Aspect |
Aria Automation 8.x |
VCF 9 Automation |
|
Primary Users |
Automation
engineers |
Platform
teams |
|
Focus |
Self-service |
Cloud
operations |
|
Scale |
Project-level |
Enterprise-level |
|
Governance |
Optional |
Built-in |
Summary
Choose Aria Automation 8.x if:
-
You need maximum customization
-
You run automation outside full VCF
-
You manage smaller or mixed environments
Choose VCF 9 Automation if:
-
You operate VMware Cloud Foundation
-
You want platform-native automation
-
You value stability, governance, and lifecycle alignment
Comments
Post a Comment